12
John Stockton
Utah Jazz
Number
#12
Position
G
Age
64
Height
6-1
Weight
175LBS
Draft
1984 R1
Pick 16
Nationality
USA
Born
Mar 26, 1962
College / Team
Gonzaga
G
Utah Jazz
1989-90
PTS17.2
REB2.6
AST14.5
1989 Schedule
All Games
vs
PHX
PHX
L
9PTS
6REB
17AST
@
PHX
PHX
W
16PTS
2REB
14AST
@
PHX
PHX
L
22PTS
3REB
19AST
vs
PHX
PHX
L
12PTS
3REB
8AST
vs
PHX
PHX
W
16PTS
2REB
17AST
@
HOU
HOU
L
10PTS
2REB
11AST
vs
MIN
MIN
W
17PTS
1REB
18AST
@
SAS
SAS
L
29PTS
3REB
15AST
@
DAL
DAL
L
17PTS
3REB
12AST
@
MIN
MIN
W
12PTS
2REB
12AST
vs
HOU
HOU
L
25PTS
4REB
11AST
vs
LAL
LAL
W
15PTS
4REB
23AST
vs
OKC
OKC
W
13PTS
6REB
20AST
@
PHX
PHX
L
8PTS
4REB
11AST
@
OKC
OKC
L
23PTS
2REB
12AST
vs
CHA
W
8PTS
1REB
14AST
@
LAL
LAL
L
15PTS
0REB
15AST
@
GSW
GSW
L
19PTS
3REB
16AST
@
LAC
LAC
W
8PTS
1REB
20AST
vs
GSW
GSW
W
1PTS
4REB
15AST
Career Trajectory
John
Stockton
Career Trajectory
DIGESTSPORTS.COM
Career Accolades
Career Statistics
| Season | Team | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1984 |
UTA
|
82 | 18.2 | 5.6 | 1.3 | 5.1 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 1.8 | 2.5 | 1.9 | 4.1 | 47.1% | 0.0 | 0.1 | 20.0% | 1.7 | 2.4 | 73.6% | 54.8% |
| 1985 |
UTA
|
82 | 23.6 | 7.7 | 2.2 | 7.4 | 1.9 | 0.1 | 2.1 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 5.7 | 48.9% | 0.0 | 0.2 | 13.3% | 2.1 | 2.5 | 83.9% | 56.6% |
| 1986 |
UTA
|
82 | 22.7 | 7.9 | 1.8 | 8.2 | 2.2 | 0.2 | 2.0 | 2.7 | 2.8 | 5.6 | 49.9% | 0.1 | 0.5 | 18.4% | 2.2 | 2.8 | 78.2% | 57.5% |
| 1987 |
UTA
|
82 | 34.7 | 14.7 | 2.9 | 13.8 | 3.0 | 0.2 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 5.5 | 9.6 | 57.4% | 0.3 | 0.8 | 35.8% | 3.3 | 4.0 | 84.0% | 64.5% |
| 1988 |
UTA
|
82 | 38.7 | 17.1 | 3.0 | 13.6 | 3.2 | 0.2 | 3.8 | 2.9 | 6.1 | 11.3 | 53.8% | 0.2 | 0.8 | 24.2% | 4.8 | 5.5 | 86.3% | 62.4% |
| 1989 |
UTA
|
78 | 37.4 | 17.2 | 2.6 | 14.5 | 2.6 | 0.2 | 3.5 | 3.0 | 6.1 | 11.8 | 51.4% | 0.6 | 1.4 | 41.6% | 4.5 | 5.5 | 81.9% | 60.7% |
| 1990 |
UTA
|
82 | 37.8 | 17.2 | 2.9 | 14.2 | 2.9 | 0.2 | 3.6 | 2.8 | 6.0 | 11.9 | 50.7% | 0.7 | 2.0 | 34.5% | 4.4 | 5.3 | 83.6% | 60.4% |
| 1991 |
UTA
|
82 | 36.6 | 15.8 | 3.3 | 13.7 | 3.0 | 0.3 | 3.5 | 2.9 | 5.5 | 11.5 | 48.2% | 1.0 | 2.5 | 40.7% | 3.8 | 4.5 | 84.2% | 59.0% |
| 1992 |
UTA
|
82 | 34.9 | 15.1 | 2.9 | 12.0 | 2.4 | 0.3 | 3.2 | 2.7 | 5.3 | 11.0 | 48.6% | 0.9 | 2.3 | 38.5% | 3.6 | 4.5 | 79.8% | 58.4% |
| 1993 |
UTA
|
82 | 36.2 | 15.1 | 3.1 | 12.6 | 2.4 | 0.3 | 3.2 | 2.9 | 5.6 | 10.6 | 52.8% | 0.6 | 1.8 | 32.2% | 3.3 | 4.1 | 80.5% | 60.8% |
| 1994 |
UTA
|
82 | 35.0 | 14.7 | 3.1 | 12.3 | 2.4 | 0.3 | 3.3 | 2.6 | 5.2 | 9.6 | 54.2% | 1.2 | 2.8 | 44.9% | 3.0 | 3.7 | 80.4% | 65.1% |
| 1995 |
UTA
|
82 | 35.5 | 14.7 | 2.8 | 11.2 | 1.7 | 0.2 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 5.4 | 10.0 | 53.8% | 1.2 | 2.7 | 42.2% | 2.9 | 3.4 | 83.0% | 64.2% |
| 1996 |
UTA
|
82 | 35.3 | 14.4 | 2.8 | 10.5 | 2.0 | 0.2 | 3.0 | 2.4 | 5.1 | 9.3 | 54.8% | 0.9 | 2.2 | 42.2% | 3.4 | 4.0 | 84.6% | 65.6% |
| 1997 |
UTA
|
64 | 29.0 | 12.0 | 2.6 | 8.5 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 2.5 | 2.2 | 4.2 | 8.0 | 52.8% | 0.6 | 1.4 | 42.9% | 3.0 | 3.6 | 82.7% | 62.8% |
| 1998 |
UTA
|
50 | 28.2 | 11.1 | 2.9 | 7.5 | 1.6 | 0.3 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 4.0 | 8.2 | 48.8% | 0.3 | 1.0 | 32.0% | 2.7 | 3.4 | 81.1% | 57.1% |
| 1999 |
UTA
|
82 | 29.7 | 12.1 | 2.6 | 8.6 | 1.7 | 0.2 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 4.4 | 8.8 | 50.1% | 0.5 | 1.5 | 35.5% | 2.7 | 3.1 | 86.0% | 59.1% |
| 2000 |
UTA
|
82 | 29.2 | 11.5 | 2.8 | 8.7 | 1.6 | 0.3 | 2.5 | 2.4 | 4.0 | 7.9 | 50.4% | 0.7 | 1.6 | 46.2% | 2.8 | 3.4 | 81.7% | 61.0% |
| 2001 |
UTA
|
82 | 31.4 | 13.4 | 3.2 | 8.2 | 1.9 | 0.3 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 4.9 | 9.5 | 51.7% | 0.3 | 1.0 | 32.1% | 3.4 | 3.9 | 85.7% | 60.1% |
| 2002 |
UTA
|
82 | 27.7 | 10.8 | 2.5 | 7.7 | 1.7 | 0.2 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 3.8 | 7.8 | 48.3% | 0.4 | 1.0 | 36.3% | 2.9 | 3.5 | 82.6% | 57.7% |
| Career | 1504 | 31.8 | 13.1 | 2.7 | 10.5 | 2.2 | 0.2 | 2.8 | 2.6 | 4.7 | 9.1 | 51.5% | 0.6 | 1.5 | 38.4% | 3.2 | 3.9 | 82.6% | 60.8% | |
| 1984 |
UTA
|
10 | 18.6 | 6.8 | 2.8 | 4.3 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 1.6 | 3.0 | 2.1 | 4.5 | 46.7% | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0% | 2.6 | 3.5 | 74.3% | 56.3% |
| 1985 |
UTA
|
4 | 18.2 | 6.8 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 2.2 | 4.2 | 52.9% | 0.2 | 0.2 | 100.0% | 2.0 | 2.2 | 88.9% | 64.4% |
| 1986 |
UTA
|
5 | 31.4 | 10.0 | 2.2 | 8.0 | 3.0 | 0.2 | 2.2 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 5.8 | 62.1% | 0.8 | 1.0 | 80.0% | 2.0 | 2.6 | 76.9% | 72.0% |
| 1987 |
UTA
|
11 | 43.5 | 19.6 | 4.1 | 14.8 | 3.4 | 0.3 | 4.4 | 3.3 | 6.2 | 12.2 | 50.7% | 0.4 | 1.3 | 28.6% | 6.8 | 8.3 | 82.4% | 61.8% |
| 1988 |
UTA
|
3 | 46.3 | 27.3 | 3.3 | 13.7 | 3.7 | 1.7 | 3.7 | 5.0 | 10.0 | 19.7 | 50.8% | 1.0 | 1.3 | 75.0% | 6.3 | 7.0 | 90.5% | 60.1% |
| 1989 |
UTA
|
5 | 38.8 | 15.0 | 3.2 | 15.0 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 2.8 | 4.0 | 5.8 | 13.8 | 42.0% | 0.2 | 2.6 | 7.7% | 3.2 | 4.0 | 80.0% | 48.2% |
| 1990 |
UTA
|
9 | 41.4 | 18.2 | 4.7 | 13.8 | 2.2 | 0.2 | 3.6 | 3.7 | 6.4 | 12.0 | 53.7% | 1.2 | 3.0 | 40.7% | 4.1 | 4.9 | 84.1% | 64.4% |
| 1991 |
UTA
|
16 | 39.0 | 14.8 | 2.9 | 13.6 | 2.1 | 0.3 | 3.6 | 2.4 | 4.8 | 11.4 | 42.3% | 1.1 | 3.6 | 31.0% | 4.1 | 4.9 | 83.3% | 54.8% |
| 1992 |
UTA
|
5 | 38.6 | 13.2 | 2.4 | 11.0 | 2.4 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 3.2 | 4.6 | 10.2 | 45.1% | 1.0 | 2.6 | 38.5% | 3.0 | 3.6 | 83.3% | 56.0% |
| 1993 |
UTA
|
16 | 37.3 | 14.4 | 3.2 | 9.8 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 2.8 | 5.5 | 12.1 | 45.6% | 0.2 | 1.5 | 16.7% | 3.2 | 3.9 | 81.0% | 52.3% |
| 1994 |
UTA
|
5 | 38.6 | 17.8 | 3.4 | 10.2 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 2.8 | 2.6 | 6.8 | 14.8 | 45.9% | 1.6 | 4.0 | 40.0% | 2.6 | 3.4 | 76.5% | 54.6% |
| 1995 |
UTA
|
18 | 37.7 | 11.1 | 3.2 | 10.8 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 3.2 | 2.8 | 3.9 | 8.7 | 44.6% | 0.6 | 2.1 | 28.9% | 2.7 | 3.3 | 81.4% | 54.4% |
| 1996 |
UTA
|
20 | 36.9 | 16.1 | 3.9 | 9.6 | 1.6 | 0.2 | 3.1 | 2.6 | 5.7 | 10.8 | 52.1% | 0.9 | 2.5 | 38.0% | 3.9 | 4.5 | 85.6% | 62.7% |
| 1997 |
UTA
|
20 | 29.4 | 11.1 | 3.0 | 7.8 | 1.6 | 0.1 | 2.4 | 2.7 | 4.0 | 8.2 | 49.4% | 0.5 | 1.3 | 34.6% | 2.5 | 3.5 | 71.8% | 56.9% |
| 1998 |
UTA
|
11 | 31.9 | 11.1 | 3.3 | 8.4 | 1.6 | 0.1 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 3.8 | 9.5 | 40.0% | 0.4 | 1.1 | 33.3% | 3.1 | 4.2 | 73.9% | 48.7% |
| 1999 |
UTA
|
10 | 34.9 | 11.2 | 3.0 | 10.3 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 2.6 | 3.0 | 4.1 | 8.9 | 46.1% | 0.7 | 1.8 | 38.9% | 2.3 | 3.0 | 76.7% | 54.8% |
| 2000 |
UTA
|
5 | 37.3 | 9.8 | 5.6 | 11.4 | 2.0 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 3.8 | 3.4 | 7.4 | 45.9% | 0.0 | 1.6 | 0.0% | 3.0 | 4.2 | 71.4% | 53.0% |
| 2001 |
UTA
|
4 | 35.4 | 12.5 | 4.0 | 10.0 | 2.8 | 0.2 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 4.5 | 10.0 | 45.0% | 0.5 | 1.8 | 28.6% | 3.0 | 3.2 | 92.3% | 54.7% |
| 2002 |
UTA
|
5 | 29.8 | 11.2 | 3.2 | 5.2 | 1.6 | 0.2 | 2.8 | 2.6 | 3.6 | 7.8 | 46.2% | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0% | 4.0 | 4.0 | 100.0% | 58.6% |
| Career | 182 | 35.1 | 13.4 | 3.3 | 10.1 | 1.9 | 0.3 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 4.7 | 9.9 | 47.3% | 0.6 | 1.9 | 32.6% | 3.4 | 4.2 | 81.0% | 56.8% |
Core
Shooting
Defense & Discipline
Scoring Counts
Assisted vs Unassisted
Shot Diet & Point Mix
Playmaking
Touches & Passing Volume
Shot Quality
Defensive Playmaking
Contests
Matchups
Defense by Distance
Rebounding
Hustle Plays
Movement
Season Totals Distribution
Compare this player
Stat basis
Player season
Compare season
2025 REG
—
VS
First
LAST
Pick a
PLAYER
Search for a player above to begin.
Powered by digestsports.com
Share this chart with anyone who needs to lose an argument.
2025 REG
—
VS
First
LAST
Pick a
PLAYER
Pick a comparison player to generate the biased list.
Powered by digestsports.com
Qualifying Min
50
GP
200
FGA
Career Totals
#52
OF 4,962
Points
19,711
#378
OF 4,962
Rebounds
4,051
#1
OF 4,962
Assists
15,806
#1
OF 4,962
Steals
3,264
#482
OF 4,962
Blocks
315
#253
OF 4,962
3-Pointers
845
#6
OF 4,962
Games
1,504
#8
OF 4,962
Minutes
2,865,655
#78
OF 4,962
Field Goals
7,039
#45
OF 4,962
Free Throws
4,788
#5
OF 4,962
Turnovers
4,242
#15
OF 4,962
Fouls
3,941
Per Game Averages
#485
OF 4,962
PPG
13.1
#1769
OF 4,962
RPG
2.7
#2
OF 4,962
APG
10.5
#5
OF 4,962
SPG
2.2
#1560
OF 4,962
BPG
0.2
#183
OF 4,962
MPG
31.8
#46
OF 4,962
TOV/G
2.8
Efficiency & Percentages
#703
OF 4,962
FG%
51.5%
#226
OF 4,962
3PT%
38.4%
#407
OF 4,962
FT%
82.6%
#474
OF 4,962
True Shooting
60.8%
Career Totals
#2
OF 368
Points
19,711
#5
OF 368
Rebounds
4,051
#1
OF 368
Assists
15,806
#1
OF 368
Steals
3,264
#13
OF 368
Blocks
315
#3
OF 368
3-Pointers
845
#1
OF 368
Games
1,504
#2
OF 368
Minutes
2,865,655
#2
OF 368
Field Goals
7,039
#2
OF 368
Free Throws
4,788
#2
OF 368
Turnovers
4,242
#2
OF 368
Fouls
3,941
Per Game Averages
#29
OF 368
PPG
13.1
#106
OF 368
RPG
2.7
#1
OF 368
APG
10.5
#1
OF 368
SPG
2.2
#102
OF 368
BPG
0.2
#11
OF 368
MPG
31.8
#3
OF 368
TOV/G
2.8
Efficiency & Percentages
#24
OF 368
FG%
51.5%
#26
OF 368
3PT%
38.4%
#34
OF 368
FT%
82.6%
#13
OF 368
True Shooting
60.8%
Career Totals
#49
OF 2,960
Points
2,436
#143
OF 2,960
Rebounds
608
#3
OF 2,960
Assists
1,839
#5
OF 2,960
Steals
338
#182
OF 2,960
Blocks
50
#102
OF 2,960
3-Pointers
111
#18
OF 2,960
Games
182
#22
OF 2,960
Minutes
383,329
#51
OF 2,960
Field Goals
855
#40
OF 2,960
Free Throws
615
#14
OF 2,960
Turnovers
517
#22
OF 2,960
Fouls
539
Per Game Averages
#201
OF 2,960
PPG
13.4
#393
OF 2,960
RPG
3.3
#2
OF 2,960
APG
10.1
#11
OF 2,960
SPG
1.9
#335
OF 2,960
BPG
0.3
#109
OF 2,960
MPG
35.1
#36
OF 2,960
TOV/G
2.8
Efficiency & Percentages
#198
OF 2,960
FG%
47.3%
#267
OF 2,960
3PT%
32.6%
#175
OF 2,960
FT%
81.0%
#134
OF 2,960
True Shooting
56.8%
Career Totals
#2
OF 153
Points
2,436
#2
OF 153
Rebounds
608
#1
OF 153
Assists
1,839
#1
OF 153
Steals
338
#8
OF 153
Blocks
50
#3
OF 153
3-Pointers
111
#1
OF 153
Games
182
#2
OF 153
Minutes
383,329
#2
OF 153
Field Goals
855
#2
OF 153
Free Throws
615
#1
OF 153
Turnovers
517
#2
OF 153
Fouls
539
Per Game Averages
#4
OF 153
PPG
13.4
#7
OF 153
RPG
3.3
#1
OF 153
APG
10.1
#1
OF 153
SPG
1.9
#8
OF 153
BPG
0.3
#2
OF 153
MPG
35.1
#2
OF 153
TOV/G
2.8
Efficiency & Percentages
#3
OF 153
FG%
47.3%
#6
OF 153
3PT%
32.6%
#4
OF 153
FT%
81.0%
#3
OF 153
True Shooting
56.8%
John
Stockton
Utah Jazz
LAST 5 GAMES
AVERAGES (PER GAME)
POWERED BY
DIGESTSPORTS.COM
DIGESTSPORTS.COM
LAST
GAMES
First Games
Stat Name
Last Games
Hover over a stat to see its trend
Trend
Game values
5-game average
Attempts Per Game
First
Last
1989 Game Log
| Date | Team | Opp | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | FGA | FG% | 3P | 3PA | 3P% | FT | FTA | FT% | STL | BLK | TOV | PF | +/- |
|---|
John
Stockton
— GAMES
— MIN
— +/-
Production
PTS—
REB—
AST—
Defense & Misc
STL—
BLK—
TOV—
PF—
Shooting & Volume
FG%—
3P%—
FT%—
FGA—
3PA—
FTA—
POWERED BY
DIGESTSPORTS.COM
DIGESTSPORTS.COM
Stat
What it means
Formula
League context
League avg
—